Archive | Bite me RSS feed for this section

DMCA Takedown (or, “Blogger cut off my telephones”)

22 Jun

Apparently somebody out there doesn’t want you to hear this, the admittedly crappy mash-up I designed to demonstrate some similarities between M.I.A.’s “URAQT” and Lady Gaga’s “Telephone”. Although I’ve recently made a move to WordPress, my old posts are still available at Blogger — and this morning, I received a DMCA takedown notice, indicating that somebody had filed a claim of copyright infringement (not specified, though presumably having to do with my sound clip), and that Blogger had removed my post from public viewing by setting its status to “draft”. (WordPress has sent me no such notification, so the post remains available here.)

As a Canadian grad student living in the US, with a legal defence fund of approximately eight dollars, I am in no position to contest this whole thing. If WordPress receives a similar notice and takes down this post, I will let them. But first, I want to say: this sound clip is a clear example of fair use. It’s a brief excerpt from two songs, placed on top of each other to show similarity, and framed by critical comment. (It’s speculative critical comment, designed to raise questions rather than to make a firm point, but I stand by it on those terms.)

I don’t know if this notice was the result of a blanket search of some sort, of if perhaps somebody is trying to avoid the kind of controversy generated by mash-ups of Avril Lavigne and the Rubinoos or Green Day and Oasis. If it’s the former, then there’s clearly a problem with the way in which that search was conducted, and in which that claim was filed. If it’s the latter — well, read the post, where I explicitly state that “I don’t think this similarity [between the two tracks] is theft of any kind”. That wasn’t my point; again, my point was to raise critical questions.

Too bad that Blogger, and whoever filed this claim, didn’t see fit to ask critical questions about the content of my post in return.

Fat kids and self-esteem

15 Jul

The Globe and Mail is reporting that overweight children suffer from anxiety as early as six years of age. I have no doubt that this is true — but I’m going to object to the framing of the results in the report. Let’s take this, for example:

Furthermore, as these children progressed from kindergarten to Grade 3, their negative feelings grew more pronounced, lead researcher Sara Gable says.

“They actually get worse, so you think about the mental health implications of that,” says Dr. Gable, an associate professor of human development and family studies. “It just adds to the body of research that we already have telling us the cost of the lifestyle problems apparent in the U.S. population.”

The clear implication is that negative feelings and poor self-esteem are a natural consequence of a ‘lifestyle problem’ — rather than the result of others’ reactions to one’s body, or of messages that one receives about one’s body. That is, fat kids have it coming, right? The bullying and social exclusion that these kids experience is simply the natural, predictable result of piggish, lazy living. A critical reading of Dr. Gable’s next comment further suggests that this is her stance:

Overweight girls were especially affected by their heavy stature, Dr. Gable adds. Bigger girls had trouble getting along with their peers and exhibited other negative behaviours that emerged after kindergarten, including a lack of self control.

If overweight girls are “especially affected by their heavy stature”, could it be because they are constrained yet more than boys by social norms about physical attractiveness? Could it be, perhaps, that we continue to value girls according to how they look — and that perhaps being chronically devalued because of ‘heavy stature’ simply hurts? The vague reference to “lack of self control” suggests a tired association between fat and behavior, and also seems to correlate fat with undisciplined, and therefore unfeminine, conduct.

These results doesn’t say to me that kids need to be put on diets: they say to me that fat prejudice starts incredibly early, and that it has the power to erode the sense of self of the young and vulnerable. They say to me that we need to stop looking at fat as a definitive marker of a ‘lifestyle problem’, and start focusing instead on the more complex business of talking about good health practices at any size. And they say to me that we have a collective responsibility to treat people with decency even if they’re fat.

In the interest of disclosure: I was a fat kid, and I’m a fat woman. And of course I struggle with self esteem. But I stand firm on this point: if you devalue me because of my size, that’s your failing, not mine. There is no natural relationship between size and self-esteem. This relationship is most transparently something that we construct in day-to-day interaction, in our media, in our culture. And while I’m all for research that explores this relationship, I am straight-up angry to see it reported as yet another reason to scold the hefty.

On that note: you know what’s really lazy? Demanding that other people change their bodies to fit your aesthetic, rather than reframing your own perception. You know what’s really a problem of self-control? Treating people — especially children — in a way that reinforces their low status, because it delights you to be so wonderfully superior. Give me the choice, and I’ll own the sin of a big round belly or a wide lumpy ass over the sin of narrow-minded cruelty any day.

No really, what the hell IS wrong with Russell Smith?

5 Oct

From today’s Globe and Mail: “Ladies, Don’t Pad Your Resumés”

The column is full of Smith’s usual hooey, exhorting women to dress for male pleasure. In particular, he’d like us to wear skimpy bras that allow for “natural sway” and — oh joy, oh bliss! — the breathtaking possibility that one might see the natural shape of a nipple, “surely the most erotic sight in clothed humans”. Part of me wants to commend him for celebrating the female body. That part of me is far outbalanced by my queasiness at the (recurring) suggestion that a woman who does not dress to please men is somehow not doing her job.

Which brings us to the headline. I don’t know if Mr. Smith writes his own headlines, but this one is simply nasty in its implications. If my breasts are my resumé, am I in fact applying for the ‘job’ of being sexually attractive to men? And being sexually attractive to men is my job, then are my breasts my primary qualification?

I can’t help but take this kind of thinking personally. I realize so often that in this culture, it is my failings as an aesthetic object that define me for other people. And yet, there is so much about me that simply can’t be seen.

(Can you hear it, at least?)

Thank you for contacting customer service

11 Aug

Dear Education Client,

Thank you for alerting me to the problem you are currently experiencing with your Education Product. I assure you that we are working diligently to address your concerns.

Upon checking your purchase history, I see that you have ordered some of our Learning Tokens, which, when accumulated in sufficient numbers, can be exchanged for entry-level employment at a rate of remuneration marginally above the government-mandated minimum. I apologize for any difficulty that you may be experiencing in accumulating these Learning Tokens.

Despite the best efforts of our Education Company, these Tokens occasionally cause difficulty for our clients. We disclose the possibility that Tokens of Grade B or lower may be issued, when Tokens of Grade A are preferred. As our Waiver indicates, these variances in Token Grade are not a result of our quality control, or of Token availability. Rather, they are designed to encourage you to accumulate these Tokens in a way that leads to ancillary benefits for you, the Education Client.

You have indicated that your current Token is unwieldy, and that you are concerned about the Grade of your Token. I assure you that your Token was issued with the utmost attention to your Client Profile. Unfortunately, we cannot guarantee Token Grade at this time. Further, if you inspect your Token closely, you will see that the Grade controls are in fact accessible by you, the Token user. If you are having difficulty in operating the Token Controls you may wish to set up an appointment with our Customer Support team. Most of our clients find, however, that with sufficient effort they are able to operate their Tokens in a way that provides our intended ancillary benefits while at the same time increasing the Token Grade. This may require you to read our Support Materials.

We regret that we cannot accept returns of Learning Tokens. You may, however, withdraw from the Token system at any time, and exchange your accumulated tokens for entry-level employment. You may also upgrade at any time. (Upgrades are reflected primarily in ancillary benefits, and while they are likely to be reflected in the Token Grade, we can unfortunately make no guarantees.)

Please do not hesitate to contact your teacher Education Product Representative if you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,
Your Education Product Representative

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.